David Ellement on Sun  7/03 10:21 -0800:
> > --- configure.in    Thu Mar  4 18:21:48 1999
> > +++ configure.in.new        Fri Mar  5 06:38:19 1999
> > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
> >     ;;
> >  esac
> >  
> > -AC_PATH_PROG(SENDMAIL, sendmail, no, $PATH:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib)
> > +ac_aux_path_sendmail=":/usr/sbin:/usr/lib"
> > +AC_PATH_PROG(SENDMAIL, sendmail, no, $PATH$ax_aux_path_sendmail)
> >  AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(SENDMAIL, "$ac_cv_path_SENDMAIL")
> >  
> >  OPS='$(srcdir)/OPS'
> 
> After applying this patch on HP-UX 10.20, configure could not find
> sendmail.

I assume that you rebuilt configure?

In that case, I guess whatever HP-UX uses as /bin/sh is not strictly
compliant with the standards.  I spent a long evening ensuring that this
bug was not in the shell parsing code from the new bash: it is SUS2
compliant; I followed the source and concurrently in a debugger.  I do
not know if SUS2 has changed how it does feild splitting from previous
versions, or the exact source of this (ie, is it POSIX specified), but I
can cite some text:

(susv2/xbd/glossary.html#tag_004_000_104)

        field

        In the shell, a unit of text that is the result of parameter
        expansion, arithmetic expansion, command substitution, or field
        splitting. During command processing, the resulting fields are
        used as the command name and its arguments.

(susv2/xcu/chap2.html#tag_001_006_005)

        Field Splitting

        After parameter expansion, command substitution, and arithmetic
        expansion the shell will scan the results of expansions and
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
        substitutions that did not occur in double-quotes for field
        splitting and multiple fields can result.

        The shell will treat each character of the IFS as a delimiter
        and use the delimiters to split the results of parameter
        expansion and command substitution into fields.

The non-parameter part of

        $PATH:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib

is not expanded by anything, and is therefore not subject to field
splitting.

-- 
Scott

Reply via email to