Axel Beckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO it would be much more useful, if jump would accept any non-digit
> as terminator of the message number to jump to and would the push that
> last typed character to execute the appropriate function.
Hmm, I don't like that idea, probably because I'm a terrible typist.
Suppose I wanted to press 't' on the current message, but my fat fingers
hit '6t' instead? Then I'd end up tagging message 6 instead, and I'd
have to untag it and go figure out where I was before. In the current
scheme, I just get a prompt to jump to message 6t, which I can cancel.
I don't think pressing <return> is too much to ask.
> Any comments?
You asked for it. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
Convex Division | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
