Op za. 25 sep 1999 21:01:11 zei Jan Peter Hecking:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 06:46:39PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> > When I receive emails from people who use %$#@& outlook there is no
> > In-Reply-To field even though they have replied to me rather than
> > compose a new mail (the subject is indeed Re: <prev subj>).
> >
> > Having failed to persuade them to use a real MUA, I was wondering if
> > the following exists in mutt: it would somewhat improve the situation
> > if I could manually force a given message to be added to a thread.
>
> Maybe you have strict_threads set in your .muttrc? If strict_threads
> is unset (which is the default, see below) mutt will try to add
> messages to threads if they share a common subject line.
I do have strict_threads set, and I think it's a good thing to have it
so, but I would also like to be able to manually, explicitly add the
odd message to a thread if I need to.
s
