On Nov 03, David DeSimone wrote:
> 
> While I agree that the nametemplate section is not necessary since
> -force_html is used, I can't see why it would cause this problem.
> Can you explain?

I actually have it working just fine with the nametemplate and w/o the
force_html switch.  I am going to use the -force_html instead (see below).

Even if you use the nametemplate, shouldn't Mutt construct a semi-random
filename with an html extension?

-Clint

Reply via email to