Hi A!
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
> > > Why not have one gpg (or pgp) config file for all correspondents?
> > >
> > The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list who use
> > PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG AFAIK. I have both
> > GPG and PGP to get around this but would like to be able to set Mutt to
> > choice the correct encryption tool depending on who the message is from
> >
> > Sean
>
> There's two ways to do this.
>
> First, to solve the receiving part, on your end. grab the rsa.c
> program that's on the GnuPG FTP site (ftp.gnupg.org:/pub/gcrypt/contrib). That
> will allow you to use GnuPG, to decrypt keys signed by PGP2 (which uses RSA).
> With that, there is also an option that you can pass to GnuPG, that could sign
> with an RSA key, that PGP2 would be able to understand. PGP5 should have no
> problem with GnuPG, for sending or receiving. But, that extension for RSA
> saved me a lot of trouble with GnuPG. Try it.
>
I grabbed rsa.c and idea.c and compiled and put to the lib directory. I then
tried a couple of archived messages available but still it says the
encryption is unknown. One did say about Not being a self signed sig.
Sean
--
GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813
To get my PGP Keys send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject
It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
PGP signature
