On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 11:59:21AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> What he said, only I'd use spamcop.net because I know about it. It's not
> only about saving time; it saves you from having to parse the headers
> yourself (though you get to see what they are, if you want), it already
> knows all of the abuse@ addresses, and it sends a nice form letter and
> tracks the email (with your actual address removed); more and more
> sysadmins are paying *lots* of attention to spamcop complaints because
> the source is usually correct and because they're rarely spurious.
I've seen that. I like it. At least for looking up contacts or IP's.
> Ralf, I haven't heard of these two. Where can I find out about them
> since I don't have time at the moment to do a google search for them? ;-)
adcomplain.pl: http://www.rdrop.com/users/billmc/adcomplain.html
It's written in Perl and has been around for ages. It's fast. It uses
abuse.net for contacts. It has problems with Postfix's
reject_unauth_pipelining :)
ricochet: http://vipul.net/ricochet (I think).
It's written in Perl and is quite young. From a software technological point
of view I'd prefer ricochet. It's OO, and cleanly written.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
Any host that rejects 8bit mail for no particular reason other then
trying to enforce use of 7bit mail is stupid!
