On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 07:39:42PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Lars --
> 
> ...and then Lars Hecking said...
> % David T-G writes:
> % > Chris --
> % > 
> % > I don't have a lot of input on your Solaris build, but I do know that the
> % > Sun-supplied make and cc just plain stink.  You mentioned that your gcc is
> % > old; can you get/build a new one and then try with that?
> % 
> %  Old by date, but still, it's the previous release :) His problems are
> %  certainly not related to this, as the real failures are at install time:
> 
> Well, I just started with his statement that an old version of gcc only
> gets about 4 lines into the process :-)
> 
No, it's an old version of GNU make, I have a very up to date version 
of gcc.
> 
> % 
> %  In there is a bug in make install for doc/muttrc.man if mutt is built
> %   outside the source directory.
> %  
> %  While Sun ships a few crappy tools, make is quite decent. And the C compiler
> %  (commercial, not the defunct stub in /usr/ucb) is quite good as well.
> 
> I know that the sparcworks compiler package is good, but I didn't know
> that one in /usr/ccs was any good.  I'm a happy Sun bigot, myself,
> and do a lot on them :-)  Maybe I'll have to check into compiliing...
> 
It's the make we're talking about here.  Sun still provides a proper
make and it's in /usr/ccs/bin/make.  That of course is also where the
'dummy' cc is that tell's you it's not a real cc if you don't have
the development tools.

-- 
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/

Reply via email to