Re: MTA comparisons (was Re: setting envelope from how?)

[cFischer]

On Wed 03.0500-13:21, Bennett Todd wrote:
> But both Postfix and qmail are very fast and reliable and secure,
> and they're both enormously simpler to configure and maintain than
> sendmail. I'd definitely recommend removing sendmail nearly
> everywhere. There are occasional jobs that sendmail can do that
> people actually need to do, that Postfix and maybe even qmail
> haven't learned to do yet. But they are rare. And if you ditch
> sendmail in favour of postfix or qmail, you lose the requirement to
> constantly upgrade, since postfix and qmail don't get security
> problems requiring urgent mandatory upgrades lest you get burgled.

i'm puzzled:  why's qmail with 232k only about 1/3rd the size of postfix?
ah well and anyhow:  a aint got the space, so's gonna be qmail 4 me!
thanks again for the info.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP signature