On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:11:05PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > Ok... I've still got some problems making my RPM for mutt and I'm not
> > sure what's causing it. I built mutt manually and then I built it
> > with the exact same options for the RPM but I get two totally
> > different outputs. The first is from the manual install and the
> > second is from the RPM install
> >
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1262377 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt*
> > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 36607 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:29 /usr/bin/muttbug*
> >
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 418000 Jun 21 11:24 /usr/bin/mutt*
> > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root root 7588 Jun 21 11:24 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock*
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6668 Jun 21 11:23 /usr/bin/muttbug*
> >
> > Anyone know why there's such a discrepancy? I think the RPM might be
> > stripping the binaries but I don't know if that would make such a big
> > difference... Doing a mutt -v on both the RPM and manual binaries
> > produces the same output:
>
> Is it possible that the first group is statically linked, and the second is
> dynamically linked?
Nope, they're both dynamic. One is stripped and the other isn't.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
Freezer Burn BBS: telnet://bbs.freezer-burn.org . ICQ: 54924721
Webmaster for the Linux Portal Site Freezer Burn: http://www.freezer-burn.org
Current Linux uptime: 2 days 5 hrs and 06 mins.
