On Thu, Sep 21, 2000, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> I seem to have found a bug in mutt, when using 'mutt recipient_address' from
> the commandline. Minimal test case follows:
>
> [charon]$ mutt foo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's not a valid address.
> It works fine with zero or one '@' signs in an address; anything more causes
> it to quit. This is causing problems for some scripts I've got which use
> mutt to send mail because of its attachment-handling capabilities.
>
> Any easy workaround?
Use valid addresses?
