Can you create a minimal mailbox which permits reproducing that
behaviour?
On 2000-09-27 16:51:50 +0100, Adam Huffman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:51:50 +0100
> From: Adam Huffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Core dump for 1.2.5i
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
> Organization: University of Manchester
>
>
> This happened when opening a mailbox, on a RedHat 6.2 system:
>
> This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"...
> Core was generated by `/usr/local/bin/mutt'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libncurses.so.4...done.
> Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...done.
> Reading symbols from /usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so...done.
> #0 strcmp (p1=0x6164612d <Address 0x6164612d out of bounds>,
> p2=0x81814a0 "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>")
>at ../sysdeps/generic/strcmp.c:38
> 38 ../sysdeps/generic/strcmp.c: No such file or directory.
> (gdb) bt
> #0 strcmp (p1=0x6164612d <Address 0x6164612d out of bounds>,
> p2=0x81814a0 "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>")
> at ../sysdeps/generic/strcmp.c:38
> #1 0x80867f6 in mutt_strcmp (a=0x6164612d <Address 0x6164612d out of bounds>,
> b=0x81814a0 "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>")
> at lib.c:544
> #2 0x8062090 in hash_insert (table=0x8624948,
> key=0x81814a0 "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>",
> data=0x8181350, allow_dup=0) at hash.c:79
> #3 0x806cdd1 in mx_update_context (ctx=0x8626110) at mx.c:1457
> #4 0x806739f in mbox_parse_mailbox (ctx=0x8626110) at mbox.c:363
> #5 0x8067520 in mbox_open_mailbox (ctx=0x8626110) at mbox.c:421
> #6 0x806bf86 in mx_open_mailbox (path=0xbfffeda0 "[mailbox location]",
> flags=0, pctx=0x0) at mx.c:639
> #7 0x805746f in mutt_index_menu () at curs_main.c:977
> #8 0x8066b53 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff984) at main.c:709
>
> Adam
>
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
