Hi,
thank you the regexp, but mutt still does not show threads. I'm
puzzled.
An example of the subjects, which should be recognized as a thread is
following:
Subject: [ifc-ml:2583] Re: Illegal circuit data for smincut
Subject: [ifc-ml:2584] Re: Illegal circuit data for smincut
The sorting method is "thread", and there is of course
"strict_threads" unset.
Somehow the regexp still does not work.
Any idea?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:27:40PM -0500, Laurent Pelecq wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:27:40 -0500
> From: Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: special reply_regexp
> Mail-Followup-To: Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mutt User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:37:41AM +0100, Daniel Kollar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in one of my folder containing msgs from a mailing list I would like
> > to sort the msgs as threads.
> >
> > With the default reply_regexp this does not work, because the mailing
> > list always puts a string "[ifc-ml:xxxx] " at the beginning of the subject
> > line of each msg. xxxx is an increasing number and is always different.
> >
> > If mutt would check for the text after this string and possible Re:'s,
> > then the threading display might work.
> >
> > Is this possible? If so, how should the reply_regexp look like?
>
> You can try "^(\[[][]*\][ \t]+)?(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*"
>
> \[[][]*\] should match: [ anything_except_brackets ]
>
> Or more specific: "^(\[[a-z0-9:-]*\][ \t]+)?(re ... "
> If you are sure that you can have only a-z0-9:- between the brackets.
>
> I've just tested that to tag messages and it worked.
>
> --
> Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
