On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Dirk Laurie wrote:
> Jürgen Salk skryf:
> > Dirk Laurie wrote:
> >
> > > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer. However, when
> > printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> > > gone, and the result looks terrible. Can I persuade mutt to use the
> > viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
> > > quoting?
> >
> > If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted lines by
> > the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the current
> > line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed with the "."
> > command. Or just type "gqG" which will reformat every line until the end.
> >
> The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
> has already been prepended to the line. I want the line-break algorithm
> to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.
vim (and vile, which I use) can reformat the quoted line.
--
T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
