On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:59:25PM -0700, Dr. Christian Seberino wrote:
>
> > You never had any strange variation of html and/or
> > xml that w3m could not handle? I'm using lynx.
> > Is w3m better than lynx at this?
>
> I have never received a message that w3m couldn't handle. I really like
> w3m because it handles tables so well, and because of a few other neat
> features. I don't think I have ever received any XML, however, and I
> have not used lynx very often since I started using w3m, so I can't
> really comment on the usability, rendering quality or robustness of the
> latest versions of lynx.
lynx works fine with email - it's webpages that I find w3m chokes on
occasionally, as well as links - I run them to compare when I'm curious if they
can do something plausible with nested tables that look a little ragged in
lynx.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
