Hi, On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:50:19AM -0500, Andy Spiegl wrote: > > Noone objected - does that mean that the code will be removed in the next > release? If no, what do I have to do so that it will be removed? As I touched upon before, I'll be unhappy if it breaks my bash new mail notification. Trouble is the bash man page didnt say how it decided if there was new mail. I don't see what the big issue is - sure it didn't work for you, but it doesn't seem to have upset many other people here. Regards, Luke
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- duplicated it [Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not u... Tony Godshall
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Luke Ross
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Stan Ryckman
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl