> Currently, that's the only way to do it.
> 
> Of course, we could throw in a heuristic which doesn't set the r 
> flag when the thread is broken up, that is, when the reply doesn't 
> contain in-reply-to.

Wouldn't it be best to have a special function that does what pressing
'm' (in the index) does, but which inserts the output of pressing '@'
(in the index) into the To:-field automatically? That might be a new
suggestion to the developers of mutt.

-Jens


Reply via email to