I'm sure that everybody here knows the problem that some email programs don't know how to reply correctly to a mail... So the threads are interrupted or shown something like this: '*>
so i looked in the header of those emails, and found that the emails which aren't recognized as an reply don't have the In-Reply-To and the References field. Ok, there is nothing to do. but in some mails, there *is* the References field (but not the In-Reply-To) and mutt does *not* recognize it... is the References field not a kind of In-Reply-To ? : if not : what is the difference. : if yes : why does mutt not see it as an reply, and can i change someting in the .muttrc to let mutt recognize it? thanks. . -- Demons are a Ghouls best Friend.
