David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks -- this is what I was looking to confirm. I apologize for the > > threading; I lost the References: line. > > LOL. I was wondering "Why is he using Outlook when he said he uses > mutt". The lack of a proper References: line is always my quick clue > which co-workers at my place of business use that awful mailer. :)
:) No, I had to get the message from a web archive which unfortunately obfuscates the References: line, thinking it's an email address. I was too quick on the 'd' key when it came through the first time :). Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
