On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 13:43:32 +0000, Dave Pearson wrote: > I can't see anything wrong with the quoting. Perhaps you're suggesting that > I should add an extra newline after my attribution line? That seems like a > reasonable idea. > > I'd assumed that we were talking about the quoting of the actual content of > an email here.
I think that sticking the attribution line to the content is a good idea. It is still readable, and we avoid to waste an empty line. Ditto for snip tags, e.g. > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah > blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah [snip] After a few quote levels, the quoted text *may* still need to be present and need to be reformated. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
