Prahlad, et al -- ...and then Prahlad Vaidyanathan said... % Hi,
Hello! % % On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 Ren� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether: % > * Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 11:22]: % > ... % > | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? % > ... % > This because the vast majority of my recipients probably thinks pgp is % > some sort of automobile ;) % % *grin* % % Yes, I think most of us have, at one time or another, received a mail % saying 'What was the attachment you sent me ?'. So, it may not be a good % idea to sign _all_ mails. Then, again, you could take the opportunity to give your thirty-second (or two-paragraph) spiel on what gpg is and why it's a Good Thing (tm). :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg20912/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
