On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:17:02PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Thomas, et al -- > ...and then Thomas Dickey said... > % On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:54:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > % > One thing you might do is to tell your editor to wrap your lines at 72 > % > characters or so... > % that's what editors are for (mutt-users seems to have a lot of vim-users, > % though of course I use vile - either way it's just a keystroke to reflow). > > Ick. I don't like reflowing someone else's text. I don't like someone > else reflowing mine, either.
I do it often enough that I don't have to look at the key I've bound that to (F7). > % > % I have a Wy30+ serial terminal that is currently sitting in my living room. > % > Have you tried running mutt with TERM=vt100? That's pretty basic and > % > simple, and should be a good start. > % vt100 is nothing like wyse30 (unless of course the wyse30 terminal > % has a vt100 emulation that he can use - then it might be something like ;-) > I figured the latter as fairly likely, but I also figured that vt100 > was about as basic as one could get. Shows you what I know :-) it's possible (about 1/4 of the time I point out that terminal xxx isn't vt100-compatible, someone says it has a vt100 emulation - though it isn't clear before/after if the requestor was using that. > Lovely Greek goo you posted a bit ago; I found it very interesting (well, > no, not really, but perhaps Skylar will find it helpful ;-) enough that he can look/compare/inquire further... -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
