On 2001.12.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to > the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask > procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it > would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? And, BTW I do > not want just > > :0: > * ^TOcstex > | grep -v '^Reply-To:' >> $MAILDIR/listy > > because I would like to make it to work even when I would change > my mind and switched to maildir format. Therefore, I would > prefer, if the actual delivery would be done by procmail.
Maybe you've already decided on another approach, but I'd do it this way. I use essentially the same formula for some list-munging of my own. ## No ":" needed, since there's no file to lock here :0 * ^TOcstex { ## First rewrite the reply-to using a known, safe mail-munging ## tool. Rename (don't remove) the header so there's a record of ## this event. :0 f | formail -R Reply-To Old-Reply-To ## Next append to the mail folder, with locking. :0 : listy } -- -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago