* Erika Pacholleck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 13:09]: > [07.01.02 10:21 -0500] David T-G <-- : > > ...and then Nick Wilson said... > > % > > % I'll stick with using *bold* like this. It works for me :) > > > > I certainly agree :-) > > I like to add a related question about "conventions": > is the * the same convention for *bold* as the _ is > is for _underline_ ?
> vote here: [x] yes [ ] no I think David mentioned USENET conventions earlier in this post. -- Nick Wilson Tel: +45 3325 0688 Fax: +45 3325 0677 Web: www.explodingnet.com
msg22576/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
