-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17 * Brian Foley said.... > > Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have blasted > you out of the water for: > a) using a two-line attribution at the top of all your quotes Oops, I just thought it looked neater as it was a little long. I don't think it does any harm though eh? > b) using a non standard sig (not delimited with "-- " and more than 4 > lines) > > I dont take issue with you for points a and b above, but it would make > you emails "neater" (but that is a highly subjective term). You hit the nail on the head there alright. I said somewhere way back in the misty and regretable past of this thread that neatness was very much a matter of opinion and that we could probably only hope to agree on the extremes and meet somewhere within a reasonable tolerance zone. (something like that anyway) and this thread has been a real eye opener in many ways! - -- Nick Wilson Tel: +45 3325 0688 Fax: +45 3325 0677 Web: www.explodingnet.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE8TJUJHpvrrTa6L5oRAnF8AJ9ZtK7dhsrJMTdkB2Le59tCMUzN1ACgruV0 nArZU4AD1dnfvgeclNkV4FM= =RheJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
