On Tue, Jan 29, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> That description isn't enough for me to have any idea what you're
> describing. Could you make a small thread and draw (do "set ascii_chars"
> if you want to be able to just copy and paste the index display into
> your email) what it looks like in 1.3.24 and 1.3.27? The major change
> between the threading in the two versions, though, is that by default
> mutt hides missing messages, so you don't see all the question marks.
Huh. This is odd. Not sure the variable here, but sometimes it acts
as it should, and sometimes not. The same thread, even. Something like:
- 5 Jan 17 Thomas Roessler ( 59) -->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
- 6 Jan 17 Michael Elkins ( 5) `->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
But I guess in the other format, it would have been:
- 5 Jan 17 Thomas Roessler ( 59) -->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
- 6 Jan 17 Michael Elkins ( 5) -->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
-Ken
