Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:55:08AM -0500: % > % > % has been changed so that application/pgp is no longer used (although % > % there's an x-mutt-action=pgp-sign flag in the content/type so that mutt % > % knows it's signed). those changes are from Thomas Roessler. % > % > I was unaware that it was broken. Can you (or someone) tell us whether % > this functionality is in 1.3.28? % % Only with a patch. Although I'm using a patch that causes the same
Ahhh... I thought that it had been integrated in .28 but was confused by the announcement. % behavior, IMHO, core Mutt shouldn't. It should be configurable whether % you'll use application/pgp or not, because there's an RFC in question % here. OpenPGP specifies application/pgp, but that breaks some MUAs that % don't follow the OpenPGP RFC. As we all know :-) % % The usual workaround is text/plain, but that needs to be user-configurable % so that people who WANT to use OpenPGP (I don't, I either use text/plain % or PGP/MIME) can. Yeah, good point. % % As I said, one of the patches for that just makes it text/plain always, % and another makes it configurable. I'm using the former by choice. I think I'm up on patches, both Shane's and Dale's, so I'm covered. Thanks for the info! :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26274/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
