On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: > As a professional perl programmer, I have to say that I've found vim to > be the least deficient in parsing perl syntax. Better than Emacs' > cperl-mode (not a flame, and observation!) and light year's better than > anything else (have you how atrocious enscript's syntax highlighting for > perl is?). The things most highlighter seem to have a problem with > (inculding emacs) is POD, regexes, and the alternative quoting mechanisms.
not at all - I see (whenever I work on that one) that vim has about as many defects in its parser as vile. ymmv. -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
