in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote parv/fastmail thusly... > > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote Sven Guckes thusly... > > > > * parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 19:39]: > > > wrote Sven Guckes thusly... > ... > > > > :0 > > > > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > IN.MUTT > > > > > > > > :0 > > > > * ^TOmutt(-dev|-users)?@.*(cs.hmc.edu|mutt.org|yahoogroups.com) > > > > IN.MUTT > > > > > > all these can be easily combined as one OR'd recipe (assuming mbox)... > > > i know, i know - but this just makes it all even more > > complicated.
either you had missed my earlier reply to john i., or confused the ease of maintaining w/ simplicity of writing a recpie... > having more than one recipe acting on single conditions delivering > to the only and same folder, as you had posted, is simpler (than > having one recipe simply OR'd to deliver to one folder)? ...which i admit i missed to recognize in my reply above due to hot head at the time. i started out writing simple recipes as you had posted, but it was not long before i realized there had to be a better way. then i discovered scoring/weighting. - parv --
