Christopher Swingley wrote: > So does this mean that the decoding I mentioned above would need to be > built into mutt? I don't know how much one-off kludging there is > inside mutt to fix non-standard behavior in other parts of the email > conversation, but this one probably wouldn't be too hard to implement. > If this is something that would be accepted, and if someone could > point me in the right direction, I'd certainly try to write a patch.
this is not really the type of thing that mutt should handle. use procmail / maildrop (and maybe perl) to rewrite the headers correctly *before* the messages get to mutt. -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >
