Hi. On Mon 2002-06-03 at 17:17:10 +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote: > Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote > >> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads, > >> only the first message. Is there any work-around for this? Would be nice > >> to be able to mark a big bunch of (non-interesting) mails read quickly. > > > > Just use > > > > <Esc>t tag-thread tag the current thread > > It doesn't do the job either.
It does, as the main concern you expressed in your mail was that the
messages inside the collopsed thread were not tagged. I did not care
to investigate behind the main issue.
You seem to be right that <tag-prefix> (;) will not work on messages
in the collapsed thread, as <tag-prefix> seems to always only work on
the displayed messages (which comes in quite handy when you are
working on a limited view).
> I did tag a certain thread with tag-thread, and then pressed
> ;N. Still, only the first article of that thread got marked read...
On this, my answer would have been: Just use
^R read-thread mark the current thread as read
For the stuff which does not have its own thread command, I fear you
have to rely on some macros as David said.
Bye,
Benjamin.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg28544/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
