Sven Guckes wrote: > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-15 14:44]: > > The following bad From formats are displayed with > > "F" flag in my index as if they were from me (andre): > > > > From: "Luca Riazzi" <LRIAZZI<removeme-cancellami>@writeme.com> > > From: "Neil Tisdale" <neil.<discard>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "lst_cwby" <mailto:l_@m_@st_@n_@__c_@wb_@y@@bt_@nt_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@m> > > > > Can I work around this somehow? > > mutt uses $alternates to figure this out. > what is the value you set? > check with "set ?alternates" > or with ":set alt<tab>=<tab>".
That has nothing to do with what he was asking about. Those are obviously malformed addresses that Mutt shows as being sent by the user. This is really a bug in the way Mutt handles malformed addresses. If there is a parse error, Mutt will return NULL for the list of addresses. Normally this would not be a problem, but because some old mail clients that people used to use did not write a From: line in the mbox for saved outgoing messages, Mutt will assume that the message from you if there is no From: line. Since Mutt represents no addresses and bad addresses the same way internally, it can't tell the difference.