-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Justin Burke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in >>> the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d. >> Why _on earth_ do you want to run SA with -d switch in this kind of >> situation? > > You want to report the original spam message. Not the SpamAssassin > modified message. The -d flag will strip the added SA headers and > text.
Yes, I'm aware of this. But still, somehow I feel, that the original author didn't have this in his mind (correct me if I'm wrong, of course). Although, maybe I'm trying to be too besserwisser here and speculating things that I shouldn't be doing. I'm just wondering if the original author really meant '-d' option, or something different. I just pointed it out (as did someone else, I notice) as it sounded a bit odd thing to do *when* a spam gets through, as the sentence before that was about how greatly the filters have worked and so on. Just tryin' to help... - -- Jussi Ekholm -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9YK5GAtEARxQQCB4RArd8AJ0atTsBGw3W2HZBYtW25pVM1ZvLngCbBnyG 16RF7aXLK7mh2shXHZ/ouu4= =pc99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
