On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:40:27PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote: > > Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through > > mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with > > a particular person. > that's what I meant ... nearly nobody has one folder per person. > > > I want to keep a record of everything I send. > sure ... that's what I meant with: > # default record location > folder-hook . set record="=sent" > > > So send gets its own folder. This is nonnegotiable. I want keep a > > record of everything I receive. I dont want to hand sort that stuff. > that's what procmail/maildrop is for. > > > (maildrop switches destination folders for me just fine, but that is > > not the kind of data I'm processing.) So all my non-newsgroup > > inbound goes to 1 folder. That is also non negotiable. > well ... _everything_ not going to a mailing list goes to let's > say =inbox ? > This would simplyfy stuff a lot ... you'd need only _one_ further > folder-hook: > folder-hook =inbox set record="=inbox" > > so everything sent from within =inbox would be recorded to =inbox. > And when replying to someone who sent a mail directly to you, it's > unlikely you're in a mailinglist folder ... isn't it? >
Cool! That means I can use:
folder-hook =inbox set record="=sent"
to record everything I sent. Then I can generate a unique link name
via safecat and hardlink all unlinked messages in 'sent' to a link
name in "inbox".
I could skip all the perl messageID scanning and maintain threads and
a separate 'sent' record list on the fly. I like it. Thanks for
the feedback.
Regards,
JPK
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children. +[]
[] []
[]+ GnuPG <ECBA EA08 C3C1 251E 5FB5 D196 F8C8 F8B7 AB60 234D> +[]
msg31156/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
