Sven,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > > it all depends on how you treat your doggie. > did you try to teach him new tricks, perhaps? > fed him any weird patches lately? or > maybe you should take it for walkies? > Well, if I fed any cookies I knew because I do not rely on dselect for any important program like vim, mutt, openss[lh], postfix and apache... However, I have not applied any patches to mutt. > well, there is the option "alias_format" - > but this would affect the presentation in the > alias menu only. i hope. but if it *does* > affect the creation of an alias with the > create-alias command then it must be because > you changed its value. but you didn't, right? > All I get when grepping muttrc and my private lpr_settings: uccellina:~/.mutt!68> grep alias muttrc lpr_settings muttrc:set reverse_alias # use realname from reverse alias lookup muttrc:set sort_alias=alias muttrc:set alias_format="%4n %t %-12a %r" muttrc:set alias_file=~/.mutt/aliases # add the Aliases here muttrc:source ~/.mutt/aliases # and include all existing aliases For sure alias_format I have not changed. > > Reply-To: Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > the Reply-To is completely redundant. > I know. But for business use, I have been asked several times why I had not set my Reply-To. Finally, I got slightly mad about all these questions. Since I am using mutt (and do rawip list-administration, if there was action ,-), I re-configured the appropriate send-hooks. Take look now. By the way, I remember when you send me some requests not to top-post and neither to include the full messages. There, you mentioned something about guidelines you have written for posting to mailing lists. Would you mind sending me the link again, and would you mind me including this link on the rawip homepage? Thanks, -- Lukas Ruf http://www.lpr.ch http://www.maremma.ch http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org} Wanna know anything about raw ip? Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] on www.rawip.org
