* John Haviland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-19 00:46 (CEST)] > My question is this - can I use uuencode to send an attachment > that mutt will see as an attachment without requiring the > uudecode.
Is there any special reason tu use the 'outdated' uudecode?
Why not using the base64, which seems to be supported by every
mailer/MUA that supports MIME (by the way, MIME is how things
are 'attached', uuencode was widely used before MIME, to insert
files into the messages (not attached to them).
--
Rafael C. Gawenda
2:346/7.549@fidonet
Registered LiNUX user #93375
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers (Pablo
Picasso)
msg31892/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
