On 2007-03-20, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, March 20 at 03:33 PM, quoth Thomas Roessler: > > On 2007-03-20 14:32:05 +0000, Rocco Rutte wrote: > >> Does getopt() prevent us from allowing any number of additional > >> arguments for -j? If you ask me, globbing is a shell's > >> reposibility. > > > > agree > > Well, currently, everything listed after a "--" is considered a > recipient. You could maybe have a flag to change that so that > everything listed after a -- is considered an attachment.
Or, anything after -a and before any other token beginning with - is considered an attachment. Examples: 1. mutt -s S -a A B C -- D A, B and C are attachments; D is a recipient. 2. mutt -s S -a A B -- C D A and B are attachments; C and D are recipients. 3. mutt -a A B C -s S D A, B and C are attachments; D is a recipient. 4. mutt -s S -a A B C A is an attachment; B and C are recipients. (Same as current behavior.) I don't like that the parser cannot know the type of the tokens following "-a A" until another "-" token or the end of the line is reached, but I thought I'd throw out the idea anyway. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA