On Tue 14.Aug.07 22:12, Hein Zelle wrote:
Is it possible to make 'r' behave like 'L' for subscribed lists that don't set the Reply-To header to the list address, or perhaps to make mutt ask if I want to reply to the list?
Sure, just use macros. folder-hook . 'bind index,pager r reply' folder-hook .lists 'bind index,pager r list-reply'You might also be interested in seeing ignore_list_reply_to for the opposite behavior.
That is, forcing you to hit L (list-reply) even if the message you're replying to has suffered from Reply-To munging. That's what I use in order to have a consistent behavior: 'L' for lists, 'r' for people. Always.
Cheers. -- redondos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
