On Tue 15.Jan.08 09:38, Francis Moreau wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:28 PM, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Monday, January 14 at 05:59 PM, quoth Francis Moreau:It seems that Trash is not really welcome in Mutt.By what metric? The fact that support for it isn't built-in (added via two simple hooks or via the trash patch linked on the mutt webpage: http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/patches/#trash) or are you seeing some sort of wider hostility to the existence of folders with that name?Yes.And "poor man's trash" comment doesn't sound that having a trash is a clever idea. ISTR to see this comment on mutt website too.
You're probably just not familiar with the term. In this world, "poor man's" something means that this something is done in a very low quality way, as if it were an imitation of an original idea for which a full implementation would take more effort to achieve.
You can read other sources such as Wikipedia or UrbanDictionary for more (probably better) definitions.
-- redondos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
