On 2008-03-05, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 02:04:48PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 5 at 12:00 PM, quoth Bill Moseley: > > >Most of the time I get HTML email that also has a text/plain part, > > >and that's what I reply to. > > > > > >I've been getting mail from someone using Thunderbird that is > > >text/html only. > > > > > >What I've been doing is hitting "e" to bring up the message in vim, > > >highlight the HTML and ! (filter) it though html2text. Then I use ^E > > >to change the content type to text/plain. > > > > > >I suspect there's an much easier way to deal with HTML-only email > > >(other than /dev/null). > > > > All you have to do is auto_view text/html and have an entry in your > > mailcap file for text/html that has the copiousoutput flag set. > > Oh, I see I disabled that in the past. I guess auto_view worked > for the pager and replying (by passing the plain text to the editor) > but the .mailcap text/html entry also effects the attachment display. > > In my attachment menu I'd like to be able to have it still run > my web browser for text/html. > > Is there anyway to say use auto_view and the .mailcap entry for the > pager, but in the attachment menu use a different mailcap entry? > I didn't see in 3.3.1 Optional Fields a way to have different mailcap > entries for the pager and the attachment menu.
Yes. http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/#html HTH, Gary
