On May 31 17:15, Rado S wrote: > =- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 16:59:22 +0200 -= > > > On May 31 15:32, Rado S wrote: > > > =- Steve S wrote on Sat 31.May'08 at 14:51:57 +0200 -= > > > > > > > I should have been more specific. Yes, that works if and only if > > > > one or more messages are tagged. However, as I understand [1], the > > > > above macro should operate > > > > > > > > - on one or more tagged messages with `;,k` > > > > > > Don't ';', because that's what the wiki said: it is already covered > > > by <tag-prefix>. > > > What you actually produced is <tag-prefix><tag-prefix> > > > => back to solo mode. > > > > Ah ok I see. To me, it sounded like the <tag-prefix> in the macro > > definition was some sort of flag telling that the macro can be > > used either with or w/o `;'. So, no `;' at all here. Thanks. > > Please improve the phrasing for the next one not to stumble over the > same thing as you did.
Yes, that was on my todo list. Done. steve