-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Wednesday, July 22 at 05:57 AM, quoth bill lam:
> Does the imap_idle or imap_keepalive need to set explicitly in 
> current HEAD version of mutt?

If you want to use the IDLE feature of IMAP, then yes, you need to set 
$imap_idle yourself. The reason it defaults to off is that there are 
several IMAP servers that claim to support IDLE but which have major 
problems if you try to use it. For example, when mutt first started 
supporting IDLE, it exposed a bug (the same bug, oddly) in both 
BincIMAP's and Dovecot's IDLE support: they didn't like it when the 
IDLE command was pipelined after another command, and that caused them 
to disconnect the client (mutt). To my knowledge, Gmail implements 
IDLE correctly, so you can safely enable $imap_idle.

The $imap_keepalive setting defaults to 900 seconds between IMAP 
commands; it should be small enough, but you may want to make it 
smaller. In the words of the muttrc man page:

     The default is well within the RFC-specified minimum amount of
     time (30 minutes) before a server is allowed to [disconnect you],
     but in practice the RFC does get violated every now and then.
     Reduce this number if you find yourself getting disconnected from
     your IMAP server due to inactivity.

> # refresh imap inbox
> # set imap_keepalive=300

You probably want to uncomment that.

> # Don't wait to enter mailbox manually #unset imap_passive
>
> # Automatically poll subscribed mailboxes for new mail (new in 1.5.11) 
> set imap_check_subscribed=yes
>
> # Reduce polling frequency to a sane level
> set mail_check=300
>
> # And poll the current mailbox more often (not needed with IDLE in 
> post 1.5.11)
> set timeout=300

That description is not quite accurate (I don't think). Check out this 
description: http://markmail.org/message/y7bbgghx4k2sxgtc

~Kyle
- -- 
Having a family is like having a bowling alley installed in your 
brain.
                                                         -- Martin Mull
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKZqH5AAoJECuveozR/AWeaUMQALDaY0YYXOXeQZ9DZ23pgHRL
huac/ZeukQIWcNABm9XbI6NBEQD/dr+dLIj6cImMjeJ67OX2qPEInbIUOi4/QeLS
zoHm+4cY+SSKFehd1wECQMvep5oeMHxVV+pZKrl8Hmx+CRGicxqQibMbpYvh02Z+
Ajl4G0uqdUCmWT/858e3qCqpaxX24uAz3gUIgTCiYAMGnHuXOvFIfFJ3LeTjVwcr
uIxMCaz1blV+Bfh8xprFErIce0Uhk8XqL0Ni2RTHWEW7AXsfETN0EvqmWufzudeS
+0auD9xpICtC8589EaQxsBxRJhjTdb+C/ak0F69OFjCtpfPvluA5vY+pZJIc1cdd
nsxeAp9OdwTiDaliQHFJ061qW2xELnjP+afQEt0rEM98dPGLJKcLjqwsYSLUPieL
6xpGO2BYTTuuuZJxrNkMlrQf/rNOMLYwCN7XrdHh0cX/mYt3lHZe9uQw7vKfvmgE
7aMJZtsxWKQgmkRDB+5mlfNGg6lMV47W/B1zPxAYyosHqTEgMgxvflGPbXy6x7a6
BD0k75O+KxWylgCzda4Gq6rpGhuFJ5C1PHpvQCy5qzfkdT4b7LFluvGn4ooRE0WN
anogrkuYirC7ceWGqh1tPw1WUtTg0aiK7Ml+49dXYdjUH+GccIhal7oLm87dXuU1
W7nUe/a+c0Khe4HKNcAc
=HGRG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to