On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:47:21AM +0200, ilf wrote: > On 04-11 20:32, Michael Elkins wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:38:19AM +0200, ilf wrote: > >> I would like a workaround to use Regex in 'lists' and 'subscribe', but > >> that feels dirty. Why doesn't Mutt allow 'lists'/'subscribe' to lists > >> based on the List-Id: header? > > The List-ID header is not necessarily a valid email address. All > > that the RFC requires is that it be a unique value for each list. As > > such, it's not terribly useful for figuring out where to reply. > > I never proposed using List-Id to figure out where to reply, List-Post > is the right field for that and it's being done nicely. > > But I think Mutt could display messages as from a list (in index with %L > and %Z) automatically, if a List-Id header is present. Then I would not > need lists/subscribe at all.
And also match them with ~l when searching. Maybe. (I'm not sure how that would work for IMAP.) Another possibility would be to have a tool that scans a folder for list addresses and constructs list/subscribed lists accordingly. Nico --
