On 13May2010 09:53, Udo Hortian <udo_hort...@web.de> wrote: | I tend to use "reply" accidentally instead of "group reply" if I reply to | messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt | if one wants to use "group reply" instead of "reply" in case that there | is more than one recipient in the mail one is answering?
I tend to always group-reply and then eyeball the list of to/cc in case it should change. If you have accidents you could map 'r' to group reply instead of plain reply. I personally feel that since group-reply is the same as plain-reply when there's only one person in the to/cc, I never reach for plain reply at all, just adjust headers if necessary later. I know that doesn't answer your actual question; I can only think of horrible hooks that look for commas in the to/cc or something, and still don't have a way to ask a question anyway. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ "Gosh, that's the 3rd motorcycle that's passed us. Sure do take their life in their hands, what with the weather and all." "Yes Janet, life's pretty cheap to that type." Audience: YEAH THAT TYPE!!!!!!
