> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:24:53PM +1000, Adam Bolte wrote: > > > Does anyone have any idea how I can trigger a hook *only* when writing a > > > new > > > message? Maybe there's a patch floating around that I should know about? > > In case this was not clear, by "new message", I mean a fresh e-mail that is > > not a reply. > > How about 'message-hook !~x . command' . > > Check the archives for a thread titled 'match messages without a reply > from anyone?' around September 16, 2009. There are some additional > patterns found there. > Thanks Monte. Interesting idea. I haven't had any luck finding a combination that works perfectly using '! ~x .' in a message-hook yet (probably due to execution order) but I'll report back if/when I find a working setup.
-Adam
