Hi, Over the last month I've been using mh style mailboxes. I mention that because mutt has been crashing since then, although it might not be significant/related.
I'm using mutt 1.5.21 OpenBSD package: System: OpenBSD 5.4 (amd64) ncurses: ncurses 5.7.20081102 (compiled with 5.7) libiconv: 1.14 hcache backend: qdbm 1.8.78 Compile options: -DOMAIN -DEBUG -HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID -USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE -USE_FCNTL +USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP +USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL_GNUTLS -USE_SASL +USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS -HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE ISPELL="/usr/local/bin/ispell" SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/mail" PKGDATADIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/etc/mutt" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" -MIXMASTER To contact the developers, please mail to <[email protected]>. To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. patch-1.5.16hg.cd.trash_folder.vl.1 None of the OpenBSD packages have the debug option compiled in, and I would prefer not to use a non-OpenBSD packaged software unless absolutely necessary. I have the mutt.core dump file; can/should I send this to someone for examination? Mail is processed by procmail using the mh rcvstore library/program to filter into mailboxes. Two days ago I started using the hcache setting and compressed hcache setting. Mutt crashed several times a day since I set those. I have removed them and it seems to be much better - is hasn't crashed yet since I removed them. Is there any more information I need to send to help with this? Until I started using the setup I described, I hadn't experienced a segmentation fault at all. Which leads me to believe my mh folders (which I occasionally use claws-mail to view) is something to do with it. I appreciate my fault report is mostly supposition. I have run gdb on the core file, I can send the output if required. I haven't included it now as I hoped someone could tell me what commands to run whilst in gdb to get the most useful information. Thanks, Jamie -- James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38
