* Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> [10-16-15 00:25]: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:06:34PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > > > lbdbq > m_inmail.list.new > > > > cat m_inmail.list > m_inmail.list.new > > Shouldn't that be: > cat m_inmail.list >> m_inmail.list.new > > otherwise it just overwrites previous output of previous instruction?
Yes, indeed. You are correct. > > sort m_inmail.list.new | sort | uniq > m_inmail.list.new2 > > > > inspect m_inmail.list.new2 > > > > If satisfied, mv m_inmail.list m_inmail.list.old > > mv m_inmail.list.new2 m_inmail.list > > > > When happy with new list, rm m_inmail.list.old -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
