Hi, RFC2822 defines a possibility to put group names in To/Cc etc ... Format is described in RFC2828 Section 3.4 Addesss Specification
"
When it is desirable to treat several mailboxes as a single unit
(i.e., in a distribution list), the group construct can be used. The
group construct allows the sender to indicate a named group of
recipients. This is done by giving a display name for the group,
followed by a colon, followed by a comma separated list of any number
of mailboxes (including zero and one), and ending with a semicolon.
Because the list of mailboxes can be empty, using the group construct
is also a simple way to communicate to recipients that the message
was sent to one or more named sets of recipients, without actually
providing the individual mailbox address for each of those
recipients.
"
Request Tracker AKA RT uses this for communicating an empty group
which looks like this and a BCC + Reply-To::
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Which is perfectly valid. The Problem is that when i press reply-group
i get the Reply-To: address in the To and the ";" in CC.
IMHO this is mishandling of addresses in mutt.
I am using 1.5.24
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
We need to self-defend - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
