On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Patrick Shanahan <p...@opensuse.org> wrote: > * Xu Wang <xuwang...@gmail.com> [05-20-16 16:14]: >> procmail seems so useful and I do not know of a good replacement for >> some of its resources. I use the formail tool quite often. >> >> I find it strange that such a useful tool never gained a maintainer. >> Here is a useful message: >> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2 >> but to me it explains why the author had to leave, not why no one picked it >> up. >> >> Is procmail fundamentally flawed or it is just that no one has found >> the time and love to commit to maintaining it again? >> >> Of course I do not judge. I have not done anything to help (except >> this complaint!). I am just curious. >> >> Please let me know if such an email is off-topic (I suppose this does >> not have direct relevance to mutt) and I will refrain from similar >> questions in the future. > > There is a procmail list and there is traffic there: > List-Subscribe: > <http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail>, > <mailto:procmail-requ...@lists.rwth-aachen.de?subject=subscribe>
Thank you, I will check it up. Kind regards, Xu
