On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, Will Yardley wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:48:54AM -0700, Claus Assmann wrote: > > mutt/gpg gives me a "BAD signature" for some recent mails on the > > openssl users list, one example message is attached. Can someone > > else reproduce the problem (the author says it verifies for him)?
> Does it verify when he receives a copy from the list? Yes (according to his reply to my question). > I saved the signature and text part of the email separately, and also > get bad signature with gpg2 via commandline (and no extra info that > might explain it). I tried that too but can't get it to verify even after following RFC 3156: MIME Security with OpenPGP which requires <CR><LF> as line endings, no trailing white space, inclusion of content headers, etc, but then I can't even verify the example in the RFC following those instructions :-( However, if I use mutt to sign and send a message to myself, I can verify it - via mutt and - "by hand" based on the RFC.
