On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 06:38:54AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, April 25, 2018 a las 08:23:37PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > escribió: > > > you might want to reconsider. you said *you* didn't make the setting, > > that "mutt" was to blame. there really is no "blame". one must make the > > settings to do what they wish and you didn't bother and now try to divert > > the responsibility. > > Wrong. There a good and bad defaults. And the default for follow_up > policy is just bad because it does, as you see in my case, things that > the user newer wanted and not even was aware of.
If the user doesn't use 'lists' or 'subscribe' in the first place, I think the MFT header should not get set. I do agree that it's slightly confusing and took me a bit to understand the difference when I started using Mutt, but I do think the onus is on the user to understand the difference between 'lists' and 'subscribe'. That said, I've made my feelings known about MFT itself earlier in this thread. w
